Dignity of Risk
Published: 26 August 2019
Published: 26 August 2019
‘Many of our best achievements came the hard way: We took risks, fell flat, suffered, picked ourselves up, and tried again. Sometimes we made it and sometimes we did not. Even so, we were given the chance to try. Persons with special needs need these chances, too.’
‘Dignity of risk’ refers to the concept of affording a person the right (or dignity) to take reasonable risks, and that the impeding of this right can suffocate personal growth, self-esteem and the overall quality of life (Ibrahim & Davis 2013).
The term, dignity of risk, first coined in 1972 by Robert Perske in relation to people living with disabilities (and further expanded in Wolpert’s 1980 ‘The Dignity of Risk’ paper), was a reaction to over-protective safeguards and a paternalistic nature witnessed in care living, which they argued, was patronising and diminished a person’s freedoms and self-esteem.
Since the first use of the phrase, our care settings have come a long way in encouraging independence and resident decision-making, and in Australia, the ‘dignity of risk’ approach is being formally integrated into residential care settings around the country (QORF 2015).
In care settings such as residential aged care, affording dignity of risk to allow a resident the same personal freedoms they would enjoy if living in an independent setting is directly tied to Standard 1 of the Aged Care Quality Standards: Consumer Dignity and Choice.
At times, however, care workers are still faced with the difficult job of balancing the dignity of risk of their clients, with their duty of care (Keast 2016).
Concerns are often raised about the disconnect between theory and practice, for instance, how risks can be taken when care workers have responsibilities and could face the brunt of complaints, or even compliance action.
The key to all this is, lies in reframing how care providers think about risk (Hermant 2015).
Home Care Today manager Ronda Held states, instead of thinking about how to avoid all risks, we should be thinking about how we can support someone to do what they want, safely (Keast 2016).
A care provider’s role could include ensuring a client’s decision is an informed one, by offering them all relevant information, and then maintaining support, whatever the outcome.
As Perske states, ‘knowing which chances are prudent and which are not’, is a skill that must be learned (1972).
A resident’s autonomy and right to make decisions for themselves should be paramount in all settings, however, your responsibilities and duty of care should not be compromised when striving to uphold these dignities.
Keep in mind the following:
(Keast 2016; Woolford 2017)