Improving Fluid Balance Charts (and Hypervolaemia v Hypovolaemia)
Published: 17 May 2020
Published: 17 May 2020
Fluid balance charts are an important piece of documentation with a poor reputation.
Despite offering valuable information that may help prevent patients from becoming seriously ill, healthcare staff are notorious for leaving them incomplete and inaccurate (Vincent & Mahendiran 2015).
Dehydration is a prevalent issue in hospitals and care settings, with many patients relying on staff to manage their fluid intake, but time constraints and inaccuracies are putting these people at risk (Litchfield, Magill & Flint 2018).
It is essential that fluid balance charts are accurately completed in order to determine a patient’s fluid input and output and identify any potential fluid loss or gain that could be detrimental, requiring escalation of care.
Fluid balance, also known as fluid homeostasis, describes the balancing of the body’s fluid input and output levels to prevent the fluid concentration from changing (Payne 2017; Bannerman 2018).
In order to maintain the necessary balance of nutrients, oxygen and water, the adult body generally requires an intake of two to three litres per day, with approximately the same output (Bannerman 2018).
Balance is naturally maintained through thirst when fluid is too concentrated and passing urine when fluid is less concentrated. However, illness or injury can alter these natural mechanisms, requiring monitoring and intervention (Payne 2017; Bannerman 2018).
You must ensure patients are adequately intaking and excreting fluid in order to maintain homeostasis.
A fluid balance chart is used to document a patient’s fluid input and output within a 24-hour period. This information is used to inform clinical decisions (such as medication and surgical interventions) from medical staff, nurses and dieticians, who all expect accurate figures in exact measurements (Georgiades 2016).
When completing a fluid balance chart, you should record any fluid intake by the patient in exact quantities, as well as the type of fluid. For example, if you give the patient a 200mL glass of water, you will record that information. You should also keep a running total (CQC 2019).
Output (urine, loose stools, vomit etc.) should also be measured in exact quantities (Georgiades 2016).
A sample fluid balance chart from the NHS can be accessed on their Patient Information Leaflets page.
While the concept of a fluid balance chart seems simple, in practice it can be difficult, and many issues with the recording process have been identified.
A study in 2015 found that nursing staff were not only unaware of the importance of fluid balance but were also conducting unnecessary monitoring - with 47% of monitoring being performed without a clinical indication (Vincent & Mahendiran 2015).
Furthermore, the study found that the average completion rate of fluid balance charts was only 50% (Vincent & Mahendiran 2015).
A different study found that although nursing staff acknowledged the importance of fluid balance, monitoring patients’ hydration was ‘one of several competing priorities’ subject to time pressures. Passive, independent patients were found to be the most adversely affected by this, as they had the capacity to manage their own fluid intake but were too anxious to request fluids from staff in fear of seeming ‘difficult’ (Litchfield, Magill & Flint 2018).
Clearly, there is significant room for improvement in fluid balance monitoring by staff. It has been suggested that a daily medical review of fluid charts would allow for more efficiency and accuracy, and reduction of unnecessary workloads, however, educating staff about the importance of fluid balance would be required in order to implement such a system (Vincent & Mahendiran 2015).
It is crucial to use fluid balance charts in order to identify if a patient’s fluid balance is positive or negative, as these imbalances will need to be remedied (Bannerman 2018).
If confronted with either kind of imbalance, remember to escalate care if the patient deteriorates and perform basic life support if required. The patient may require critical care services.
A positive fluid balance indicates that the patient’s fluid input is higher than their output (Bannerman 2018). The condition describing excess fluid is known as hypervolaemia or fluid overload.
Hypervolaemia causes excess fluid in the circulatory system, which may overwork the heart and lead to pulmonary oedema (Granado & Mehta 2016).
Causes of Hypervolaemia:
Signs and Symptoms of Hypervolaemia:
(Fresenius Kidney Care 2019; Granado & Mehta 2016)
The following are some methods for treating and managing hypervolaemia, depending on the cause and medical advice received.
(Fresenius Kidney Care 2019)
A negative fluid balance indicates that the patient’s fluid output is higher than their input (Bannerman 2018). The condition describing inadequate fluid is known as hypovolaemia.
Hypovolaemia is caused by significant fluid loss (hypovolaemic shock is defined as a loss of more than 20%), preventing the heart from circulating enough blood around the body. This can result in organ failure. Hypovolaemic shock is life-threatening (Nall & Gotter 2016).
Causes of Hypovolaemia:
(Nall & Gotter 2016; Taghavi & Askari 2019)
Signs and Symptoms of Hypovolaemia:
(Bannerman 2018; Procter 2019; Nall & Gotter 2016)
(Nall & Gotter 2016)
In order to curb any preventable fluid imbalances, it is crucial to correctly record your patients’ fluid input and output. Having a well-documented fluid balance chart allows nurses to recognise trends that indicate a patient may be heading in a downward spiral.
Early detection of an imbalance will allow appropriate reversal and will reduce the risk of patients being admitted into critical care.
In order for this task to be performed adequately, it is essential that staff are educated about the importance of fluid balance, and that any necessary interventions are made to ensure that the process is completed properly.
Question 1 of 3
What defines a positive fluid balance?
Start an Ausmed Subscription to unlock this feature!
Ausmed’s Editorial team is committed to providing high-quality and thoroughly researched content to our readers, free of any commercial bias or conflict of interest. All articles are developed in consultation with healthcare professionals and peer reviewed where necessary, undergoing a yearly review to ensure all healthcare information is kept up to date. See Educator Profile